Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 Md. App. 62 - Spriggs v. State

152 Md. App. 62 - Spriggs v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · North Carolina v. Alford · Dedo v. State · 76 Md. App. 731 - Coley v. State · Toney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A court may order home detention, monitored by a licensed private home detention monitoring agency, as a condition of pre-trial release. A place identified in such an order is a place of confinement, and a defendant who violates a restriction on movement or fails to return under a home detention order or agreement may be found guilty of [second] degree escape.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “applies to a person who is committed to home detention by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a place identified in a home detention order or agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.