Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 Me. 13 - State v. Gaudin

State v. Gaudin’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
March 1990
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 1990

15 state decisions

6019561960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Safe Deposit Co. v. Stead · Hunter v. Totman · State v. Wallace · State v. Koliche · State v. Bunker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The word ‘possession’ is often ambiguous in its meaning. It is used to describe actual possession and also to describe constructive possession. Actual and constructive possession are often so blended that it is difficult to see where one ends and the other begins. National Safe Deposit Co. v. Stead, 232 U.S. 58 , 34 S.Ct. 209 , 58 L.Ed. 504 . Actual possession exists where the thing is in the physical control, or immediate occupancy of the party. Constructive possession is that which exists in contemplation of law without actual personal occupation. Constructive possession often refers to the person lawfully entitled to immediate physical possession and control. In criminal law possession usually means care, management, physical control, or the secret hiding or protection of something forbidden or stolen. See [2] Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (Rawle’s 3rd Revision) ‘Possession;’ 33 Words and Phrases, ‘Possession’ [pp.], 71-101 and many cases there cited.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““No person shall hunt, kill or have in his possession any caribou or moose or parts thereof.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.