Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 Me. 78 - Pike v. State

Pike v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2000

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

70195619601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · United State v. Morgan · Betts v. Brady · Gallegos v. Nebraska · Gibbs v. Burke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The remaining and vital issue in the case relates to the matter of counsel at the hearing in Superior Court at which the petitioner pleaded guilty. The Justice, in his decision, said: ‘With reference to the claim of the petitioner that he was. refused an attorney, although petitioner testified that he asked the-County Attorney and á deputy sheriff for a lawyer, he also testified that, he had been convicted on other occasions of felonies, and knew that the-presiding Justice had authority to-appoint counsel in his behalf. The presiding Justice was not requested to provide counsel. This Court rules-that under the circumstances of this. ■case that petitioner waived any right to have counsel assigned to him. I find no evidence upon which to warrant the relief requested.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘Q. Now isn’t it true, Charles, in your long experience in the criminal courts, that you well know that the presiding Justice has authority vested in him to appoint counsel in .your behalf if you can prove to him that you can’t afford it of your own means ? A. Yes. “ ‘Q. You know that today and you knew it in 1953, isn’t that true? A. Yes.’"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.