Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 MICH 244 - Lasley v. Kniskern

Lasley v. Kniskern’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
February 1954
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1954

6 state decisions

20190819101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Clark v. Gilbert · Sparrow v. Hovey · Key v. Jennings · Whitaker v. Erie Shooting Club · Dausch v. Crane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ It is not enough that a party sets up a hostile claim, and that that claim is known to the original owner. He who seeks to obtain title by adverse possession must not only have a hostile claim, but he must be able to point to a possession under it which is hostile to the original owner.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.