Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 MICH 310 - Young v. Stein

Young v. Stein’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
4
states following
October 1941
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1941

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

3019081910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wildey v. Fractional School District Number One · Lamson v. City of Marshall · Gier v. Daiber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the work included in this contract is to be done under the direction of the said architects and that their decision as to the true construction and meaning of the drawings and specifications shall be final.” “Article IV. The contractor shall provide sufficient, safe and proper facilities at all times for the inspection of the work by the architects or their authorized representatives; shall, within twenty-four hours after receiving written notice from the architects to that effect, proceed to remove from the grounds or buildings all materials condemned by them, whether worked or unworked, and to take down all portions of the work which the architects shall by like written notice condemn as unsound or improper, or as in any way failing to conform to the drawings and specifications, and shall make good all work damaged or destroyed thereby.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The provision in paragraph 13 ‘that in each of the said cases the architect shall certify in writing that all the work upon the performance of which the payment is to become due has been done to their satisfaction’ indicates clearly that the acceptance ‘by the owner and architect’ is to be evidenced by the certificate of the architect. This certificate the contractor obtained, and, being made by the owner’s unquestioned agent, acting entirely within the scope of his express authority, it bound the owner, in the absence of any showing of fraud or collusion, as much as though he himself had signed it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““It is clear that, under this contract, the determination of the architect as to what is required of the contractor by the plans and specifications is conclusive upon the contractor, and, unless such determination is likewise conclusive upon the owner, we should have the anomalous and unconscionable result that the owner might contest the contractor’s right to compensation for work performed by him precisely as ordered by the owner’s agent, the architect, whose orders he was bound to obey. Such a construction of the contract ought not to be adopted unless imperatively required by its terms.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.