152 Misc. 2d 215 - In re Helmsley’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2001
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here the offender is sentenced to a revocable sentence or to a short definite term, the court is best able to monitor through the probation department or a like agency, the offender's progress toward rehabilitation and the necessity for the issuance of a certificate of relief, ... [but] [w]here the offender is sentenced to felony time, the State Parol Board is better equipped to monitor the offender's progress and needs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the statutory scheme dictates that those offenders who are convicted and receive felony time must make their application to the State Parole Board, and this is so whether the conviction arose in this jurisdiction or any other jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.