Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 Miss. 476 - Hulett v. Hulett

Hulett v. Hulett’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably 480 So. 2d 1120 - Carr v. Carr (1985), Winfield v. Winfield (1948)

41 state decisions

1601928193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Banks v. Banks · Smith v. Smith · Sallee v. Sallee · Walker v. Walker · State Ex Rel. Shad v. Fowler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where an offense of this kind is sought to be proven by circumstantial evidence, the circumstances must be proven with reasonable certainty, and the circumstances so proven must be such that the conclusion sought to be established follows logically from the facts. If there are two or more reasonable theories which may be drawn from the facts proven, the proof will be insufficient because, to invest mere circumstances with the force of truth, the conclusion must not only be logical, and tend to prove the facts charged, but must be inconsistent with a reasonable theory of innocence. ( 118 Miss. at 787-88 , 79 So. at 842 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “only the parties to the suit are concerned with the issues, and ... in the absence of a statute permitting such intervention, the same is not permissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “not a party to the suit, to intervene in a divorce suit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.