Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 MO 317 - Baustian v. Young

Baustian v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1899

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
11
states following
October 1962
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 74 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently October 1962 · most notably Williamson v. St. Louis Public Service Co. (1952), State Ex Rel. Terminal Railroad v. Flynn (1953)

2 federal appellate · 74 state decisions — followed in 11 states

28018991900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carvin v. City of St. Louis · Badgley v. City of St. Louis · Norton v. City of St. Louis · Geer v. Missouri Lumber & Mining Co. · City of St. Louis v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““They are of the same character of evidence as diagrams and pictures drawn by hand; not, necessarily carrying the same degree of probative force, but still of the same character; not in themselves evidence at all, hut representing to the eye what the witness declares, was the real appearance of the thing at the times he saw it. Diagrams, drawings, and photographs are resorted to only because the witness cannot, with language, as clearly convey to the minds ol' the court and jury the scene as the light printed it on the retina of his own eye at the time of which he is testifying.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.