¶1DECISION
¶2The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 2 years, imposed on March 22nd, 1968, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that:
¶3(1) The sentence be and remain as originally imposed by the sentencing court.
¶4The reason for the above decision is that the sentence appears ■sufficiently lenient in that defendant was convicted of uttering a fraudulent check punishable by not more than 5 years imprisonment •or by a fine of not more than $5000, or both, and first received a ■3-year deferred imposition of sentence which was later revoked for ■added fraudulent check writing, yet was given but a 2-year sentence with jail time credit of 52 days, and will be eligible for parole consideration in January, 1969 after being received September 27, 1968.