¶1 The evidence in this case fully warranted the court in submitting the case to the jury. The only assignment of error relates to- the evidence of the State’s witness, Eichard Ivey, for the purpose of contradicting or impeaching by his own declarations the defendant’s witness, William Powell.
¶2 We do not deem it necessary to- pass on the exception, because, in view of all the evidence, it is not of sufficient importance- to warrant a new trial.
¶3 The judgment is
¶4 Affirmed.