Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 N.C. App. 1 - In Re Mills

152 N.C. App. 1 - In Re Mills’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lassiter v. Department of Social Services of Durham County North Carolina · Matter of Montgomery · Matter of Ballard · 91 N.C. App. 668 - Clark v. Williamson · 147 N.C. App. 349 - In Re Nesbitt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether the trial court's findings of fact are based on clear, cogent, and convincing evidence and whether those findings support the trial court's conclusion that grounds for termination exist pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1111.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) The court may terminate the parental rights upon a finding of one or more of the following: (1) The parent has abused or neglected the juvenile. The juvenile shall be deemed to be abused or neglected if the court finds the juvenile to be an abused juvenile within the meaning of G.S. 7B-101 or a neglected juvenile within the meaning of G.S. 7B-101. (2) The parent has willfully left the juvenile in foster care or placement outside the home for more than 12 months without showing to the satisfaction of the court that reasonable progress under the circumstances has been made in correcting those conditions which led to the removal of the juvenile. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`Clear, cogent and convincing describes an evidentiary standard stricter than a preponderance of the evidence, but less stringent than proof beyond a reasonable doubt.' And it `has been defined as evidence which should fully convince [the finder of fact].'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.