152 N.C. App. 126 - In Re Shaw’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7502
Relies on 72 N.C. App. 155 - County of Wayne Ex Rel. Williams v. Whitley · In Re Thrift · Thrift v. Buncombe County Department of Social Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An adjudication of abuse, neglect or dependency in the absence of an adjudicatory hearing is permitted only in very limited circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Nothing in this Article precludes the court from entering a consent order or judgment on a petition for abuse, neglect, or dependency when all parties are present, the juvenile is represented by counsel, and all other parties are either represented by counsel or have waived counsel, and sufficient findings of fact are made by the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no valid consent judgment [can] be entered. " In re Shaw, 152 N.C. App. 126, 130 , 566 S.E.2d 744, 746 (2002) . See also Thrift, 137 N.C. App. at 563 , 528 S.E.2d at 397 ("[A]ll parties must be present in order for the trial court to enter a consent judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.