Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 N.C. App. 196 - In Re Pineault

152 N.C. App. 196 - In Re Pineault’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Easterling · State v. Wiggins · 77 N.C. App. 110 - In Re Bass · 150 N.C. App. 127 - In Re Brown · State v. Brackett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Respondent's teacher] heard respondent state, in a loud, angry voice, "f____ you." Ms. Carlson was required to stop teaching the class and escort respondent to the principal's office. . . . [Respondent] twice said to her, "f____ you, b____ch," evincing a clear disrespect for her authority. . . . [Ms. Carlson] was away from the classroom for more than several minutes. We hold, given the severity and nature of respondent's language, coupled with the fact that Ms. Carlson was required to stop teaching her class for at least several minutes, that respondent's actions substantially interfered with the operation of Ms. Carlson's classroom[.]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the attention of several school officials including the principal, teachers, and the assistant principal. As a consequence of respondent's behavior, these officials stopped teaching and performing various administrative duties to attend to him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Ms. Carlson was required to stop teaching the class and escort respondent to the principal's office. . . . [Respondent] twice said to her,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.