Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 N.C. App. 564 - State v. Lippard

152 N.C. App. 564 - State v. Lippard’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Kirby v. Illinois · Moran v. Burbine · Patterson v. Illinois · Sutton v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “our appellate courts have repeatedly held that a delay in the entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law does not amount to prejudicial error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.