Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 NCAPP 659 - Sudds v. Gillian

Sudds v. Gillian’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2022

7 state decisions

40200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc. · Koontz v. City of Winston-Salem · 130 N.C. App. 729 - Bruce-Terminix Company v. Zurich Ins. Co. · 51 N.C. App. 264 - Cunningham v. Brown · Grimsley v. Nelson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the existence of a mutual mistake of fact, and (2) a resultant failure of the document as executed to reflect the parties' intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.