Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 N.C. App. 701 - State v. Alexander

152 N.C. App. 701 - State v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Negron v. United States · State v. Ramey · Avriett v. Avriett · State v. Locklear · State v. Gell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a witness's prior statement contains facts that manifestly contradict his trial testimony, however, such evidence may not be admitted under the guise of corroborating his testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`consider whether the State has presented substantial evidence of each essential element of the crime charged.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.