152 N.C. App. 94 - Hutton v. Logan’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Caldwell v. Deese · Reid v. Eckerds Drugs, Inc. · State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities Commission · Adams v. Mills · Capital Motor Lines v. Gillette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While [the] legislature could have been more precise in its language granting immunity to the Good Samaritan, we hold that [our Good Samaritan statute] insulates the rescuer from liability for ordinary negligence from the person rescued only. In light of the intent behind Good Samaritan statutes to remedy the gap left by the common law in allowing the person rescued to sue the rescuer, it does not appear reasonable that our legislature intended to provide a blanket immunity as to all persons other than the person rescued. Rescuers must stand on their own and defend suits maintained by third parties who were allegedly injured as a result of the rescuer's negligent conduct during the rescue attempt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he general concentration of [Good Samaritan] statutes is on insulating the rescuer from liability for negligence to the person rescued.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“at the scene of a motor vehicle crash on any street or highway to any person injured as a result of the accident[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.