Nickerson v. Nickerson’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 1982
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Eicher v. Eicher · Holmes v. Holmes · Specht v. Specht · Swolec v. Swolec · Peterson v. Peterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In determining the question of alimony or division of property as between the parties the court, in exercising its sound discretion, will consider the respective ages of the parties to the marriage; their earning ability; the duration of and the conduct of each during the marriage; their station in life, including the social standing, comforts, and luxuries of life which the wife would probably have enjoyed; the circumstances and necessities of each; their health and physical condition; their financial circumstances as shown by the property they owned at the time of the divorce, its value at that time, its income-producing capacity, if any, whether accumulated or acquired before or after the marriage, the manner in which it was acquired, and the contributions each has made thereto and, from all the relevant facts and circumstances relating thereto, determine the rights of the parties and make an award that is equitable and just.” Nickerson v. Nickerson, 152 Neb. 799 , 42 N. W. 2d 861 . See, also, Ristow v. Ristow, 152 Neb. 615 , 41 N. W. 2d 924 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Strasser v. Strasser
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.