Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 NH 467 - State v. Knickerbocker

State v. Knickerbocker’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
5
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Marion · Arizona v. Youngblood · United States v. Lovasco · United States v. Gouveia · State v. Ball

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he defendant must initially show that actual prejudice has resulted from a delay. Once such a showing has been made, the trial court must then balance the resulting prejudice against the reasonableness of the delay.” As the trial court correctly ruled, “whether the Government acted in bad faith in delaying indictment” is “[o]ne factor to consider in assessing the reasonableness of the delay.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.