152 Ohio App. 3d 59 - State v. Rutland’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2023
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Thompkins · State v. Smith · State v. Henderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Impersonate' means to act the part of, assume the identity of, wear the uniform or any part of the uniform of, or display the identification of a particular person or of a member of a class of persons with purpose to make another person believe that the actor is that particular person or is a member of that class of persons.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“pursuant to R.C. § 109.71 (A). Id. A township constable is commissioned and employed by either an Ohio subdivision or by a metropolitan housing authority. R.C. § 109.71 (A)(1); Id. The second recognized type of constable is a court-appointed”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“No person shall impersonate a peace officer or a private police officer.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.