152 Ohio App. 3d 75 - Wilson v. Semco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2020
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Horton v. Harwick Chemical Corp. · 42 Ohio App. 3d 6 - Midwest Specialties, Inc. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. · Hannah v. Dayton Power & Light Co. · 105 Ohio App. 3d 1 - Jacobs v. Racevskis · Holzemer v. Urbanski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has several different meanings, depending on the context in which the term is used. Res judicata has been used in a broad way to include both major aspects of former adjudication, encompassing claim preclusion and issue preclusion. In order to give more consistency to the use of terms in this area of the law, the accepted current usage of res judicata falls within this broad sense. Authorities now generally prefer the use of the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.