152 Ohio App. 3d 760 - State v. Dixon’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably State v. Edwards, Unpublished Decision (8-2-2004) (2004), State v. Wendel (2016)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Bruton v. United States · State v. Bradley · California v. Green · Smith v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must concern `some occurrence startling enough to produce a nervous excitement in the declarant,' which occurrence the declarant had an opportunity to observe, and must be made `before there had been time for such nervous excitement to lose a domination over his reflective faculties.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter unless circumstances indicate a lack of trustworthiness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In a criminal prosecution, the state is not permitted to ask the jury to convict in response to public demand, commonly known as the `send a message' argument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.