Spencer v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1998
5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terrell v. Allison · Rhyne v. Turley · Jones Leather Co. v. Woody · Williams v. Baldrey · Reed v. Fichencord
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The conduct was tortious and was an abuse of process, for which [the defendant] was responsible as well as was the deputy sheriff. James v. Graham, [ 114 S.C. 107 , 78 S.E. 82 (1913)]; 50 C.J. Process, § 383, p. 618, and cases cited.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gore v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.