Lund v. Lund’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Garetson Lumber Co. v. Hinson · Moore v. Simonson · Hall v. O'Connell · Williamson v. Roberts · Webster v. Rogers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[i]t was in keeping with equity that Robertson should be reimbursed for the money advanced to Lund for the purpose of redemption. Otherwise, plaintiff and the defendant mortgagors might have been deprived of any interest in the property."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to wrongfully deprive his wife of her interests as co-mortgagee and to violate his trust relationship with [the Bates defendants].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“preclude[d] [the defendant Lund] from acquiring an outstanding title to the prejudice of the beneficiaries under the trust.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.