Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 P.3d 474 - LaBrake v. State

LaBrake v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2023

9 state decisions

40200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Risher v. State · State v. Jones · Herman E. Kohen and Al B. Moll v. H. S. Crocker Company, Inc. · Hamilton v. State · J & L Diversified Enterprises, Inc. v. Municipality of Anchorage

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a defendant's] assertions concerning the legal effect or categorization of the underlying occurrences [nor a defendant's] concluso-ry assertions concerning the ultimate facts to be decided.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] court deciding a motion for judgement on the pleadings need not assume the truth of the [party's] conclusions of law, nor the truth of the [party's] assertions concerning facts that are legally impossible, or the party's assertions concerning matters that would not be admissible in evidence. Moreover, the court need not assume the truth of assertions that are patently false or unfounded, based on the existing record or based on the court's own judicial notice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[When the superior court decides whether the defendant's petition states a prima facie case for relief, the superior court is obliged to view the factual allegations of the defendant's petition in the light most favorable to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.