152 So. 2d 754 - State v. Curtis’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1967
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bisaillon v. Sureck · Smith v. State · W O R Z., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission · 102 So. 2d 814 - Shargaa v. State · Barnhill v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * having previously been convicted, adjudicated guilty and sentenced for a violation of F.S. 849.09(1) (h) [F. S.A.] on February 13, 1963, to wit: Lottery Law Violation; did then and there unlawfully have in her possession certain tickets in a lottery for money * * *■””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.