Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 SO3D 445 - Lightfoot v. State

Lightfoot v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Chapman v. State of California · Neder v. United States · Harris v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “under the Sixth Amendment, any fact (other than a prior conviction) that exposes a defendant to a sentence in excess of the relevant statutory maximum must be found by a jury, not a judge [ 1 ] , and must be established beyond a reasonable doubt, not merely by a preponderance of the evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “for life or not more than 99 years or less than 10 years.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a fact increasing either end of the sentencing range (the minimum or the maximum) produces a new penalty, constitutes an element of the offense, and must be found by the jury, regardless of what sentence the defendant might have received had a different range been applicable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.