Lightfoot v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Chapman v. State of California · Neder v. United States · Harris v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“under the Sixth Amendment, any fact (other than a prior conviction) that exposes a defendant to a sentence in excess of the relevant statutory maximum must be found by a jury, not a judge [ 1 ] , and must be established beyond a reasonable doubt, not merely by a preponderance of the evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. R.V.D. v. State · R.V.D. v. State“for life or not more than 99 years or less than 10 years.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. R.V.D. v. State · R.V.D. v. State“a fact increasing either end of the sentencing range (the minimum or the maximum) produces a new penalty, constitutes an element of the offense, and must be found by the jury, regardless of what sentence the defendant might have received had a different range been applicable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hall v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.