State v. Ramires’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2025
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 659
Relies on Simmons v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · Jones v. United States · South Dakota v. Opperman · Rawlings v. Kentucky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[0]nly one basis remains for establishing standing to file a motion to suppress evidence with respect to the Fourth Amendment, that basis being the legitimate expectation of privacy in the place or thing searched. In other words, in order for a defendant to be aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure sufficient to allow his filing of a motion to sup press under the Fourth Amendment, seeking to invoke the exclusionary rule, there has to be a showing that he has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the place or thing searched.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. West · State v. Woodrome“Despite the deference we afford the trial court's order, 'the ultimate issue of whether the Fourth Amendment was violated is a question of law which [we] review[ ] de novo. '”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. West
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.