Brown v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co. · 133 Ohio St. 520 - Hummel v. Hummel · Suhre v. Busch · In Interest of MEW
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[N]o exhaustive catalog can be made of the types of wrongful retention of property which have moved [courts] to decree a constructive trust. Wherever equity finds such a wrongful holding, it will give relief, whether the type of injustice be new or old.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“the touchstone for imposition of a constructive trust is injustice or unfairness, which may take the form or be the product of fraud (actual or constructive), abuse of a fiduciary or constructive relationship, undue influence, or unjust enrichment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Technically, constructive trusts are not trusts at all but equitable devices employed by courts . . . 'regardless and independently of any actual or presumed intention of the parties to create a trust.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.