¶1 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
¶2 In his motion for a rehearing, appellant re-asserts his contention that the jury arrived at their verdict by lot and not by any expression of opinion by the jurors.
¶3 This question was fully discussed in our original opinion, and many cases were cited in support of the opinion expressed by the court.on the subject. We see no need for any further discussion of the question.
¶4 The motion for a rehearing is overruled.
¶5 Opinion approved by the Court.