Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 Va. 1014 - Fenner v. Commonwealth

Fenner v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2009

21 state decisions

60192919301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mitchell v. State · State v. Clinton · Birmingham Union Railway Co. v. Hale · Ayres v. Duprey · People v. Abbott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Alibi is regarded by some courts as a special affirmative defense, but the better doctrine seems to be that it is not a defense in the accurate meaning of the term, but a mere fact shown in rebuttal of the State's evidence; and, consequently, the evidence introduced to support it should be left to the jury, uninfluenced by any charge from the court tending to place it upon a different footing from other evidence in the case or calculated to disparage and excite prejudice against it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “where the accused relies upon or attempts to prove an alibi in his defense, the burden of proving the alibi rests upon him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]t is strange that prosecuting attorneys continue to ask for this instruction and trial courts continue to give it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.