Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 Vt. 46 - Albarelli v. Albarelli

Albarelli v. Albarelli’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2018

18 state decisions

1201989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 64 Md. App. 487 - Rosenberg v. Rosenberg · 142 Cal. App. 3d 350 - In Re Marriage of Hopkins · 57 Md. App. 662 - Dobbyn v. Dobbyn · Cleverly v. Cleverly · Marriage of Taylor v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “marital assets should be valued as close to the date of trial as possible.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “As a general proposition, marital assets should be valued as close to the date of trial as possible. While our case law has not previously spelled out such a principle with specificity, we recently held that relying on a valuation of marital property conducted three years before trial constituted an abuse of discretion by the trial court. Cleverly v. Cleverly, 151 Vt. 351, 354-55 , 561 A.2d 99, 101 (1989). We think that this principle is the one most consistent with the mandate of 15 V.S.A. § 751(a) that the trial court “equitably divide and assign the property,” and the one that best promotes fairness in the imprecise task of setting valuations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.