¶1 (dissenting) — The instruction quoted is technically wrong in part, hut when read as a whole I cannot conceive of its having a misleading effect upon the jury. I therefore dissent.
¶2 Holcomb, J., concurs with Tolman, J.
152 Wash. 5
277 P 81
Peart v. Perry
Decided May 1, 1929
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1929-05-01
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1930
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1929-05-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →