State v. Maddox’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Franks v. Delaware · Andresen v. Maryland · 95 Wash. 2d 898 - State v. Seagull · United States v. Ocampo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Probable cause exists where there are facts and circumstances sufficient to establish a reasonable inference that the defendant is involved in criminal activity and that evidence of the criminal activity can be found at the place to be searched.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is only the probability of criminal activity, not a prima facie showing of it, that governs probable cause. The [issuing judge] is entitled to make reasonable inferences from the facts and circumstances set out in the affidavit.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he length of time between issuance and execution of the warrant is only one factor to consider along with other relevant circumstances”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.