Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 Wis. 2d 284 - State v. Shanks

152 Wis. 2d 284 - State v. Shanks’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably State v. Bollig (2000), State v. Handy (1990)

40 state decisions

2001989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ristaino v. Ross · 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · United States v. Barker · United States v. Navarro-Flores · 60 Wis. 2d 121 - Libke v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The liberal rule for withdrawal of a guilty plea before sentence is consistent with the efficient administration of criminal justice. It reduces the number of appeals contesting the "knowing and voluntariness" of a guilty plea, and avoids the difficulties of disentangling such claims. It also ensures that a defendant is not denied a right to trial by jury unless he clearly waives it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[d]enial of intent during the plea colloquy, coercive action by defense counsel, haste and confusion in the plea taking, and a prompt motion to withdraw.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “incriminating statements by a defendant subsequent to the plea could, as a practical matter, make a defendant's guilty or no contest plea irrevocable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.