Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 Wis. 2d 293 - State v. Steadman

152 Wis. 2d 293 - State v. Steadman’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1952

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Russell · New York v. Ferber · Stanley v. Georgia · Lord Electric Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may arise where the government itself [is] so enmeshed in the criminal activity that prosecution of the defendant [would be] repugnant to the American criminal justice system.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 184 Wis. 2d 287 - State v. Albrecht · 170 Wis. 2d 198 - State v. Hyndman
  2. “shocking to a universal sense of justice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 215 Wis. 2d 487 - State v. Sample · 184 Wis. 2d 287 - State v. Albrecht

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.