Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 Wis. 2d 408 - State v. Schultz

152 Wis. 2d 408 - State v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Simmons v. United States · Mincey v. Arizona · Harris v. New York · United States v. Salvucci

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No person . . . shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[n]o person. . .may be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself or herself.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “At this hearing the defendant may take the stand and testify for the limited purpose of making a record of his version of the facts and circumstances under which the confession was obtained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.