Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 A2D 577 - Gladstone v. Bennett

Gladstone v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2014

3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

601959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co. · Hays v. Georgian Inc. · 16 Del. Ch. 347 - Henderson v. Plymouth Oil Co. · 33 Del. Ch. 246 - Braun v. Fleming-Hall Tobacco Co. · Moore v. Warrior Coal & Land Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . The law, of course, favors the voluntary settlement of contested issues. Because of the fiduciary character of a class action, the court must participate in the consummation of a settlement to the extent of determining its intrinsic fairness. In determining the fairness of a settlement, however, there is no requirement that opportunity be given the parties to hold a trial as to the issues. To do so would defeat the basic purpose of the settlement of litigation. . “Approval of a class action settlement requires more than a cursory scrutiny by the court of the issues presented. The function of the court is discharged, however, when the nature of the claim, the possible defenses to it, the legal and factual obstacles facing the plaintiff in the event of trial are weighed and considered. If, in the light of these matters, the court approves the settlement as reasonable through the exercise of sound business judgment, its function as the so-called third party to the settlement has been discharged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.