In Re Roesner’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 1202 · 11 U.S.C. § 1204 · 11 U.S.C. § 1207 · 11 U.S.C. § 1221 · 11 U.S.C. § 1222 · 11 U.S.C. § 1224 · 11 U.S.C. § 1225
Relies on Farrey v. Sanderfoot · In Re Citrowske · Matter of Pianowski · Dunivent v. Schollett · In Re Bonanno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“bankruptcy courts have no power to review percentage fees set by the Attorney General....”); In re Marriott, 156 B.R. 803, 805 (Bankr.S.D.Ill.1993) (concluding”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Acevedo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.