Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 BR 565 - In Re Walker

In Re Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
August 2016
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2016

60199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1323 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1329 · 11 U.S.C. § 506

Relies on Dewsnup v. Timm · Hyman v. Plotkin · Hougland v. Lomas & Nettleton Co. · Lindberg Armstrong v. A Lindberg · Hyman v. Plotkin (In Re Hyman)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In applying the standards of proposed 11 U.S.C. § 1325 (a)(4) to the confirmation of a modified plan, "the plan" as used in the section will be the plan as modified under this section, by virtue of the incorporation by reference into this section of proposed 11 U.S.C. § 1323 (b). Thus, the application of the liquidation value test must be redetermined at the time of the confirmation of the modified plan.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In order to determine whether [the requirement of § 1325(a)(4) ] is met it is necessary to determine, hypothetically, what the dividend to creditors would be if the debtor’s estate were liquidated in a Chapter 7 case. To make this hypothetical calculation it is not only necessary to determine the value of the property of the estate but what portion of the estate would be exempt. It would only be the value of the property, less the exemptions, which would be available to creditors. The debtor's claim of exemptions is a necessary element in making this determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.