Specht v. Tinsley’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 1983
most recently cited
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stilley v. Tinsley · Trueblood v. Tinsley · Freeman v. Tinsley · Lowe v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1. The sentencing court had no jurisdiction of the person of the accused; or “2. The sentencing court had no jurisdiction of the crime alleged in the information or indictment; or “3. The sentence imposed was not ‘within the prescribed statutory limits’, be it as to the sentence proper or the designated place of incarceration. “See Lowe v. People, 139 Colo. 578 , 342 P.2d 631 ; Freeman v. Tinsley, 135 Colo. 62 , 308 P.2d 220 and Stilley v. Tinsley, Colo., 385 P.2d 677 .” 385 P.2d at 424-425.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.