Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

153 F.2d 212

Docket No. 10062.

Haley v. Van Lierop

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 12, 1945.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1945-12-12

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1945-12-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2022 · most notably Hickman v. Taylor (1947), In re Sealed Case (1982)

22 federal appellate · 8 district · 23 state decisions — followed in 11 states

280194519501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Fox & Fox, of Kalamazoo, Mich., for appellant.

¶2Stearns, Sharpe & Stapleton, of Kalamazoo, Mich., for appellee.

¶3Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and McAL-LlSTER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel; and it appearing from the testimony of appellant’s agent, who contracted for the purchase of the gladioli bulbs involved, that the transactions were had with the appellee as a grower of gladioli and not as a broker, and that the parties contemplated that the orders would be filled from crops grown by the appellee upon his land or upon land under lease by him in Indiana; and it being established also by substantial evidence that the gladiolus crop for the 1943-44 season and production from the plantings of the appellee were about or below fifty per cent, of normal: It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons stated in the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

/153/f2d/212 · .json · Public domain