Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 F.2d 334 - Schwartz v. Seldon

Schwartz v. Seldon’s Empirical Analysis

153 F.2d 334 · 1945

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2008

7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

801945195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Assessors of the Parish of Orleans v. New York Life Insurance Company · Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. Henderson · Forsberg v. Security State Bank of Canova · Matter of Interocean Mercantile Corporation · Superior Court of California v. Caminetti

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the policy would not lose its exempt character unless the payment constituted a transfer made with 'actual intent' to defraud creditors, as required by § 166 (of the N.Y. Insurance Law) if exemption is to be defeated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(e)ven the conversion of nonexempt property into exempt property by an insolvent contemplating bankruptcy has been held a transaction not intended to defraud creditors in the absence of evidence of extrinsic fraud,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the record contains no evidence justifying an inference of 'actual intent' to defraud creditors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.