Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 F.2d 35 - Ross Engineering Co. v. Pace

Ross Engineering Co. v. Pace’s Empirical Analysis

153 F.2d 35 · 1946

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2011

12 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

8019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Clifford Macevoy Co v. United States · Baltimore Co v. United States · United States v. Blair ex rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co. · United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The cases uniformly hold that questions of waiver are questions of fact to be submitted to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.