Federal Deposit Ins. v. George-Howard’s Empirical Analysis
153 F.2d 591 · 1946
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 1992 · most notably United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit (1991), Meyerland Co Federal Deposit Insurance Corp Fslic v. Meyerland Co
14 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 264 · 12 U.S.C. § 632 (§ 25b of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913) · 28 U.S.C. § 41 · 28 U.S.C. § 42
Relies on Gully v. First Nat. Bank in Meridian · D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance · West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Kline v. Burke Construction Co. · Osborn v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“after giving the Corporation power generally to “sue and be sued, complain and defend, in any court of law or equity, State or Federal”, further expressly provides ... that “All suits of a civil nature at common law or in equity to which the Corporation [in its own capacity] shall be a party shall be deemed to arise under the laws of the United States.” This special provision reasonably can only mean that all such suits ... must legally be regarded as arising under the laws of the United States____”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is firmly established that, in the absence of enactments plainly expressing that purpose, Congress will not be held to have intended to restrict that jurisdic tion [established in Osborn and Pacific Railroad ].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.