Gregory v. Widnall’s Empirical Analysis
153 F.3d 1071 · 1998
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles (2003), William J. Ray v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General (2000)
19 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Monge v. California · Feres v. United States · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth · Bagdadi v. Nazar · Ellison v. Brady
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Title VII applies to Guard technicians except when they challenge personnel actions integrally related to the military's unique structure'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he more outrageous the conduct, the less frequent must it occur to make a workplace hostile.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“clearly arise from the same transactional nucleus of facts. " The record supports this finding. Both causes of action are predicated on racial discrimination and allege the same circumstances regarding Appellants' terminations. Although the current action also alleges retaliation and hostile work environment, these are "all grounds for recovery which could have been asserted, whether they were or not, in a prior suit between the same parties . . . on the same cause of action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.