Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 F.3d 272 - United States v. Weinstock

United States v. Weinstock’s Empirical Analysis

153 F.3d 272 · 1998

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably United States v. Salgado (2001), United States v. Hardy (2000)

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1701998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341

Relies on Stirone v. United States · Greer v. Miller · United States v. Miller · Ford v. United States · United States v. Hathaway

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) it must have been made in the course of a regularly conducted business activity; (2) it must have been kept in the regular course of that business; (3) the regular practice of that business must have been to have made the memorandum; and (4) the memorandum must have been made by a person with knowledge of the transaction or from information transmitted by a person with knowledge.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Rule 803(6) does not require that the custodian personally gather, input, and compile the information memorialized in a business record.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Weinstock did not use his podiatric skills to facilitate the crime. Although performing unnecessary medical procedures requires a special skill, refraining from providing such services and falsely billing therefore does not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.