Pearson v. Edgar’s Empirical Analysis
153 F.3d 397 · 1998
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably Anderson v. Treadwell (2002), Lavey v. City of Two Rivers (1999)
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. Fox · Frisby v. Schultz · Carey v. Brown · Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Absent any intervening Supreme Court decisions, Curtis and South-Suburban would be binding precedent on this issue, and Curtis would also be the law of the case.”). Such a lopsided verdict from our peers provides yet another reason to question the wisdom of departing from our circuit’s well-settled published opinion rule. 4 . To the extent the majority suggests a three-judge panel can overrule published opinions because they're”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gonzalez v. Arizona“no evidence ... that real estate solicitation harms or threatens to harm residential privacy.” Id. at 404 . We noted in that case that the Rowan test was not applicable to such an underbroad statute, even though the statute was of an opt in nature. Id. at 404 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The district court found as a fact that the state produced `no evidence in this case that real estate solicitation harms or threatens to harm residential privacy.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.