Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 153 F.3d 481 - Curran v. Kwon

Curran v. Kwon’s Empirical Analysis

153 F.3d 481 · 1998

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
2
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp. (1999), Murphy v. Missouri Department of Corrections (2004)

14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

370199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Messenger v. Anderson · Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. United States · Bagley v. IBP, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[L]aw of the case,’ as applied to the effect of previous orders on the later action of the court rendering them in the same case, merely expresses the practice of courts generally to refuse to reopen what has been decided, not a limit to their power.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a condition where one is induced by a wrongful act or threat of another to make a contract under circumstances which deprive him of the exercise of his free will”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “) (1983); Messinger v. Anderson, 225 U.S. 436, 444 , 32 S.Ct. 739 , 56 L.Ed. 1152 (1912) (Holmes, J.) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.