Rhoden v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
153 F.3d 773 · 1998
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2015
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on New Jersey v. New York · Kashif v. United States · Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney · Thompson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Delta Airlines, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The failure of appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Fed. R.App. P. 4(a) [controlling the appeal deadline in civil cases] is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this court can neither waive nor extend. Baker v. Raulie, 879 F.2d 1396, 1398 (6th Cir.1989) (per curiam). Fed. R.App. P. 26(b) specifically provides that this court may not enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“doctrine, did not mention the Thompsondecision, and was decided prior to the Osterneck decision. 5 Although counsel for the appellee apparently believed that the Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion tolled the appeal period, there was no specific assurance by the district court judge that the motion was timely filed or that it tolled the appeal period. Accordingly, it does not fall within the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rhoden v. Campbell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.